Jonathan Simon is a professor at the Berkeley Law School and a member of the Haas Institute's Diversity and Democracy research cluster. His scholarship focuses on the role of crime and criminal justice in governing modern societies. He recently published a book, Mass Incarceration on Trial: A Remarkable Court Decision and the Future of Prisons in America, which offers a critique of mass incarceration in California and explores current efforts to challenge this system. Prof. Simon blogs at prawfsblawg and governingthroughcrime, and tweets @jonathansimon59.
Recent blog posts from Haas Institute and Faculty
A summer classic: Moral panic over a pier shooting
"It comes at a time when white anxiety over the growing Latino population in the United States has become a dominant obsession with the Republican party. Indeed, Republican politicians have found themselves in something of a dilemma over which to attack among two of their favorite targets: liberal cities like San Francisco or the Obama administration."
"The alleged Charleston perpetrator chose the historic black church not just to kill nine innocent blacks people but to send a message. And while his method was vicious and extreme, there are still many messages and symbols driven by the anxiety of the decline of white dominance and the growing population of those considered "other."'
Obergefell v. Hodges: A Dead-End for LGBT Civil Rights?
"Only 22 states prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. In most states, LGBT persons can be legally discriminated against in employment or housing, for example. A decision in Obergefell grounded in constitutional rights and equal protection for same-sex couples would have potent precedential value by establishing new constitutional norms. "
"My answer is: its an act of terrorism that calls for a political response, but we need a more complicated framework to think about how mental illness and acts rooted in diseased ideation can parallel acts of terrorism."
July 1, 2015: The critical Supreme Court decision that granted same-sex couples the right to marry across the nation is a historic moment and one that we at the Haas Institute not only applaud, but deeply celebrate. Extending the right to marry, and the benefits of marriage to gay and lesbian couples, advances a larger vision of belonging and equal protection for all members of society.
Friday morning's decision was the precursor to a weekend of nationwide expressions of celebration and unbridled joy. Many expressed astonishment this victory could happen in our lifetimes. Many felt their lifetime's work and love of another lifted up by that single statement at the end of the majority opinion: It is so ordered.
June 25, 2015: The Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society applauds the Supreme Court’s landmark decision to uphold a key legal protection in the 1968 Fair Housing Act in its decision for Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. the Inclusive Communities Project. The Institute was also thrilled to learn that the opinion of the Court, delivered by Justice Kennedy, directly cited an amicus brief that was jointly filed last December by the Haas Institute and the Economic Policy Institute in support of The Inclusive Communities Project. Entitled the Brief of Housing Scholars, it was signed by 62 of the nation’s most widely known and respected historians, social scientists, demographers, and housing scholars.
In its opinion, the Court held for the first time that the Fair Housing Act prohibits race-neutral housing policies that nonetheless have a disparate impact on the basis of race, color, religion, religion, national origin, gender, disability, or family status. Disparate impact, a standard previously applied by eleven of the United States Courts of Appeals, enables courts to invalidate discriminatory policies, regardless of whether such discrimination was intentional.
July 3, 2015: The Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society published a “hopeful and speculative” essay arguing that Americans are poised to enter a new era of enduring prosperity led by African Americans and immigrants, those who previously have been held back.
In recent months, prominent national Liberal and Progressive analysts issued studies dramatically describing the crisis of extreme inequality and putting forward a bold but familiar policy agenda to address it. Authored by Mark Gomez, Realizing Possibilities of the Connected Economy instead looks at the opportunity presented by our remarkable prosperous Connected Economy and our current“formative political” period.
The Future of SNAP? Improving Nutrition Policy to Ensure Health and Food Equity.
A Workshop for Academics, Policymakers, and Community Representatives
According to the USDA, food insecurity occurs when “consistent access to adequate food is limited by a lack of money and other resources at times during the year.” In 2013, 49.1 million Americans lived in food insecure households, including 15.8 million children. Food insecurity exists in every county in America, and disproportionately affects single parent households, Black households, and Latino* households at higher rates.
On Friday, May 29, 2015, the Haas Institute and the Berkeley Food Institute convened an all-day, interdisciplinary workshop to discuss the future of the SNAP program. The workshop brought together researchers and students, federal & state agency representatives, program administrators, and community representatives to share research findings, report challenges, and share policy and education recommendations for the program moving forward.
We are actively seeking feedback on the conference! Please fill out our online evaluation form.
We would also like to collect as many unique personal and professional perspectives on Othering and Belonging as possible - please let us know if you are interested in publishing a blog post about your conference experience or your work. Contact the Haas Institute editorial team to discuss possible contribution.
The Haas Institute released its 2014 Annual Report. Download the report.
#BlackLivesMatter: Haas Institute Responses
The collective and sustained outcry we are in the midst of represents both a systematic failure in our society that can be revealed "wherever we are willing to look" as well as a transformative opportunity to build a real movement for change. Read all responses, media appearances, and opinion pieces from Haas Institute and UC Berkeley's Diversity Research Faculty